Показаны сообщения с ярлыком georgia. Показать все сообщения
Показаны сообщения с ярлыком georgia. Показать все сообщения

воскресенье, 21 сентября 2014 г.

International Day of Peace - 21 September 2014

By Megi Benia, Georgia

Message for peace from YWEPS




Each year the International Day of Peace is observed around the world on 21 September. The General Assembly has declared this as a day devoted to strengthening the ideals of peace, both within and among all nations and peoples.

The theme of this year’s International Day of Peace is the “Right of Peoples to Peace”.

Wonderful theme indeed, but how?

Considering current situation, how can we say to people, make them believe, that they have right to peace? Today, in absolutely chaotic conditions, when almost each part of our beautiful world is involved in military campaigns, when every day thousands of people die by gun, how to keep trust in peace in ordinary citizen, who wakes up every day with thoughts how to stay alive and to save their children?
 
These questions are really complicated and the worst side is that we do not have the proper and clear answers on them. But we definitely know the fact that we all have RIGHT TO PEACE and we should fight for it as we fight for the right to live. I think these two rights are very close  and sometimes are the same.

All of us should encourage each other, that we have right to peace and we should fight for it through all possible peaceful ways, because we have to use PEACE FOR PEACE instead of war for peace. This is the most important one, because I believe that


“If we are to reach real peace in this world and if we are to carry on a real war against war, we shall have to begin with children; and if they will grow up in their natural innocence, we won’t have to struggle, we won’t have to pass fruitless idle resolutions. But we shall go from love to love and peace to peace, until at last all the corners of the world are covered with that peace and love for which, consciously or unconsciously, the whole world is hungering.”

Mahatma Gandhi

пятница, 8 августа 2014 г.

Ukraine Crisis: What Should Have Been Done

Megi Benia, Georgia

Ukrainian Crisis is a process which highly concerns the world community and first of all the European Union as it influences various aspects of this community, such as economical, political or defense issues. All the windows of opportunity for multilateral talks to end the violence in Ukraine have been closing immediately, although there were several things that should have been done in order not to make situation such critical and in this article I will try to demonstrate them.

Let’s recall how it all started - everything began when in November 2013, widespread protests broke out in Kiev, the capital of Ukraine. These protests responded to President Viktor Yanukovich’s decision to back out of the plan to sign a far-reaching agreement with the European Union (EU). The plan would  establish a closer political and economic relationship with the EU, and would signal Ukraine’s interest in joining the twenty-eight nation bloc. Pro-EU Ukrainians took to the streets, hoping that Yanukovich would retract his decision. He did not, and instead signed a $15 billion trade deal with Russia. Pro-EU demonstrators rejected Yanukovich’s decision to deepen Ukraine’s ties with Russia and continued their demonstrations. Moscow controlled the territory of present-day Ukraine for centuries, up until 1991, and many protesters did not want to see hard-won gains, specifically those tied to political and economic independence, undone.

In January 2014, Yanukovich’s government implemented anti-democratic legislation restricting political dissent. The legislation banned the installation of tents and stages in public spaces, criminalized the use of masks and helmets at protests, and outlawed the slandering of government officials. Facing immense public pressure and criticism from the international community, the government repealed the laws just two weeks after they had been enacted. Anti-Yanukovich demonstrations and fears about Russia’s sway over Ukraine continued. In late February, the violence reached an all-time high with rising death tolls among protesters and the police. Under growing pressure, Yanukovich fled Kiev and the parliament voted to oust him from government. After this turn of events, the chiefs of the riot police and security forces signaled their interest in withdrawing from all conflict.

In March, Russian Parliament approved Vladimir Putin's request to use force in Ukraine to protect Russian interests. Pro-Russian rallies were held in several Ukrainian cities outside Crimea, including the second-biggest city Kharkiv. Barack Obama told Mr. Putin to pull forces back to bases.

On 6 of March, Crimea's parliament voted to join Russia and scheduled a referendum for 16 March. On 16 of March, Official results from Crimea's secession referendum said 97% of voters backed a proposal to join Russia and on 18 of March Putin signed a treaty absorbing Crimea into Russia it was the first time the Kremlin expanded the country's borders since World War II. Kiev said the conflict reached a "military stage" after a Ukrainian soldier was shot and killed by gunmen who stormed a military base in Simferopol. Crimea's pro-Kremlin police department said a member of the local self-defense forces was also killed in the same incident.

We agree that all countries on the international arena have their own interests and sometimes some of them, especially the most powerful ones have global interests, but we also must remember that all countries have the right for self-govern and all of them have to respect this right.

There were several things, that had to be done both inside of the Ukraine and outside from the International Community.

First of all, when the Euromaidan had demanded cooperation with European Union and at the same time the opposing demands had been increasing in the Easter Ukraine and Crimea, it was important to use the mechanisms of negotiation and mediation, but this had not be done. Opposing to this Russian Language was banned as a second official language of the State and of course this was one of the main reasons of increasing discontent and aggression from the Russian speaking population of Ukraine.

Secondly, in any newly erupted conflicts it is recommendable to prevent it in the beginning, until the tensions increases and grows into something irreversible, however if the armed conflict erupts anyway, the active involvement of international and local powers are highly essential to achieve a ceasefire. The latter is vital to protect human lives.

The most important thing in any situation in our daily life is to safe human life, to protect women and children, to make losses minimal on both sides and finally to achieve consensus in any debates.

 Maybe it is possible to achieve some results with weapons, but no victory and success is worth even one human life. We should build a state, where every single human life is valuable, is respected and protected so that entire community is safe and valued as well.



среда, 25 июня 2014 г.

Negotiation between USA and Iran – Is it Possible or not? Some Implications for the Middle East Security


Megi Benia, Georgia

On April 7, 1980, the United States broke diplomatic relations with Iran after the attack of American embassy in Tehran in 1979.

On September 2013, the presidents of America and Iran spoke directly for the first time since 1979, setting the stage for delicate negotiations that could reshape the two adversaries' relationship. As it was written in the article of “The Wall Street Journal” (27.09.2013) “The 15-minute call between Barack Obama and Iran's Hasan Rouhani, which focused on Iran's disputed nuclear program, topped a week of dramatic twists and turns. It also highlighted how critical Washington and Tehran have become to each other's pressing geopolitical goals.”


This conversation, which was held after 34 year of silence, gives us important massages about the future relations between two states - USA and Iran. Why this is important and what are the main benefits for the Middle East region?
First of all, it is important to mention that USA government always has tried to find reliable ally in the Middle East to balance Iran. In the end of 20th century this kind of actor was Iraq and USA felt itself in safety, but when Iraq became the threat for the regional stability and the regime of Saddam Hussein was defeated, for U.S. government the main political backer in the Middle East was Israel.  However, now as the development show, Israel tries to become the leader of the region not giving the attention to the fact of  USA.
On the other side there are have several problems in the region: Syria, militant movements in the region and the Palestinian territories.
U.S. president Barack Obama tries to find the ways for solution of all the problems listed above through the negotiation processes on nuclear weapons with Iran. Obama focuses on curtailing Iran's nuclear program, dismantling Syria's chemical weapons and providing an Arab-Israeli peace agreement.
He needs support from Iran's president by all means to achieve lasting success at any of those, because Iran is the biggest backer of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and has developed militant movements in Lebanon, Syria and the Palestinian territories that could have opened the Mideast peace process. 
It is time for peace in the Middle East, which it has been waiting for the decades and if modern superpower has will to implement peace in this region, it will happen despite the fact that this process has unnerved many of Washington's closest Mideast allies beyond Israel, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

The conflict in Ireland: British-Irish Dimensions


Tato Chkhaidze, Georgia

One might argue but to my mind even today the situation is similar to what it’s called ‘the Hobessian nature of the state’ - it is about ‘all war against all the rest’. Conflicts around the world still have ethnic, political and as many characters as one could imagine.


The very calm and non problematic Britain has had and probably still has the Iris conflict. The problem of Ireland lies IN THE ACT OF 1920 when it was divided into 2 parts - North the dominion of The British and South Ireland, which ‘gained’ the status of the free state. The main conflict is and was between the unionists (loyalists) and the republicans, who followed the dream of the united Ireland. In other words, the conflict was between the oppressed Catholics and dominant Protestants. The conflict started because Catholics rights were violated, they started protests through peaceful forms but were answered by powerful forces of UVF. So Catholics seemed defenseless and here was IRA to ‘’help”  them. Today IRA is labeled as the terroristic organization, but in the beginning IRA tactics were sincerely defensive rather than offensive. The political wing - Sin Fein also played an important role, and later gained 10 % of electoral votes. But the only way was the political talks than the terroristic acts. So the labourist Blair had tried to negotiate with the terrorists as a second side (quite unusual for political talks as the 2 sides have to be states of parties etc). 
The last Belfast so called Good Friday agreement followed the Anglo-Irish and Framework agreements (the most important ones), was the resolution for the conflict, in a way that it stated that  any decision about the future of the island of Ireland will be made by the people of North as well as South Ireland by the referendum. The problem of Ireland is not solved yet as the referendum has not taken place. Why? Because demographically Catholics are far fewer than Protestants so in case the referendum is held Protestants who are the majority will vote for the Union with Britain. Only then will the referendum make sense, when Catholics will become equal or more in quantity than they are now.
So the perspectives are that the final resolution will be by no means made peacefully by the referendum as the will of the Irish people is prior to anything that might be artificially imposed upon them. Last but not the least, the RIRA (that is the offspring of IRA, having the only significant military power now) should decommission entirely and the Catholics, who are for the partition, should outnumber the unionist Protestants. Let’s wait, the time will show but as it seems the all war against all the rest should be regulated but the peaceful processes.

Megi: Create peace in the world is very important nowadays


I am a student of International Relations at Tbilisi State University and my future career plans are to work in the field of international relations, conflict management and Regional politics. Currently I am member at Young Diplomats’ Club of Georgia and member of our network.


Create peace in the world and first of all in our region and our country is very important nowadays. We should work harder in this direction and I  believe that we can achieve our goals.


Nina: help others!

Hi! This is Nino and I do plan to find and spread the power to change the world advancing those young women who stay behind the stage. If we can, we are obliged to help others!

Nina Ananiashvili, Tbilisi


Tato: we can make a positive shift


Hello. I am Tamar (Tato) Chkhaidze. Politics and International Relations is sphere of my academic interest. Therefore, I am a part of young experts of peace, willing to make my say together with my colleagues. To my mind, by cross-fertilization of ideas within and outside of this group, we can make a positive shift in the peace and security of the South Caucasus.