By Declan Walsh
“Who is Malala?” shouted the
Taliban gunman who leapt onto a crowded bus in northwestern Pakistan two years
ago, then fired a bullet into the head of Malala Yousafzai, a 15-year-old
schoolgirl and outspoken activist.
That question has been answered
many times since by Ms. Yousafzai herself, who survived her injuries and went
on to become an impassioned advocate, global celebrity and, on Friday, the
latest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize alongside the Indian child rights
campaigner Kailash Satyarthi.
Yet since that decisive gunshot
in October 2012, Ms. Yousafzai and her compelling story have been reshaped by a
range of powerful forces — often, though not always, for good — in ways that
have left her straddling perilous fault lines of culture, politics and
religion.
In Pakistan, conservatives
assailed the schoolgirl as an unwitting pawn in an American-led assault. In the
West, she came to embody the excesses of violent Islam, or was recruited by
campaigners to raise money and awareness for their causes. Ms. Yousafzai,
guided by her father and a public relations team, helped to transform that
image herself, co-writing a best-selling memoir.
And now the Nobel Prize
committee has provided a fresh twist on her story, recasting her as an envoy
for South Asian peace.
Announcing the prize in Oslo on
Friday, the committee chairman, Thorbjorn Jagland, said it was important for “a
Hindu and a Muslim, an Indian and a Pakistani, to join in a common struggle for
education and against extremism” — a resonant message in a week in which the
Pakistani and Indian armies have exchanged shellfire across a disputed stretch
of border, killing 20 villagers. But it was also a message that highlighted how
far Ms. Yousafzai has come from her original incarnation as the schoolgirl who
defied the Taliban and lived to tell the tale.
Amid the debate about the
politics of her celebrity, few question the heroism of Ms. Yousafzai — a
charismatic and exceptionally eloquent teenager who has followed an astonishing
trajectory since being airlifted from Pakistan’s Swat Valley. At just 17, she
has visited with President Obama and the queen of England, addressed the United
Nations, and become the youngest recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize since it
was created in 1901.
She learned of her award on
Friday when a teacher called her from a chemistry lesson at Edgbaston High
School for Girls in Birmingham, the English city she now calls home.
“I was totally surprised when
she told me, ‘Congratulations, you have won the Nobel Peace Prize, and you are
sharing it with a great person who is also working for children’s rights,’ ”
Ms. Yousafzai said at a news conference.
She will share the $1.1 million
prize with Mr. Satyarthi, 60, a veteran, soft-spoken activist based in New
Delhi who has rescued trafficked children from slavery.
“If with my humble efforts the
voice of tens of millions of children in the world who are living in servitude
is being heard, congratulations to all,” Mr. Satyarthi said in a television
interview on Friday.
There had been some speculation
that the Nobel committee, which last year gave the prize to the Organization
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, might withhold it this year, as it did
in 1972 during the Vietnam War.
Yet Ms. Yousafzai offered an
emotional counterpoint to grinding conflict in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere. “With
her courage and determination, Malala has shown what terrorists fear most: a
girl with a book,” said Ban Ki-moon, the United Nations secretary general.
In Pakistan, she has come to
symbolize the country’s existential struggle against Islamist violence. She
rose to prominence in 2009 as the author of an anonymous blog that described
life in Swat at a time when fighters, armed with Kalashnikovs, terrorized the
valley’s residents and shut schools where girls were being educated.
Later, she became a national
news media figure, speaking about the need for peace, which drew her into the
Taliban’s cross hairs. In the summer of 2012, the insurgents hatched a plan to
kill her, then put it into action that October.
After the shooting, with
life-threatening wounds to her head, Ms. Yousafzai was flown to Britain for
treatment. But back in Pakistan, a news media-driven backlash had already
started, some of it by crude conspiracy theories — accusations that the
teenager was a C.I.A. agent, a blasphemer or a traitor.
But more reasonable people were
discomfited, too — in particular by the way Western news media outlets lionized
Ms. Yousafzai at a time when American drones were pounding targets in the
tribal areas, sometimes killing civilians.
“Malala’s story, and the way it
was framed, fitted neatly into a certain Western narrative,” said Ziyad Faisal,
an economics student in Milan, Italy. “But at the end of the day, she’s just a
teenage girl. She means so many things to so many people.”
After surgeons inserted a
titanium plate in her head, Ms. Yousafzai made a rapid recovery, and quickly
drowned out her critics with her preternatural poise and speaking skills. She
shifted her focus, moving away from the fight against the Taliban and toward a
broader advocacy for children. An alliance with Gordon Brown, the former
British prime minister turned education campaigner, honed a message she
continued to deliver on Friday.
“This award is for all those
children who are voiceless, whose voices need to be heard,” she said. “I speak
for them, and I stand up with them.”
But that advocacy — important
yet politically inoffensive — has also drawn sharp criticism from those who say
that the choice of Ms. Yousafzai exemplifies the way the Nobel Prize has
strayed far from the purpose intended by Alfred Nobel, the Swedish chemist who
invented dynamite and who originated the prize.
“This is not for fine people
who have done nice things and are glad to receive it,” said Fredrik Heffermehl,
a Norwegian jurist who has written a book on the prize. “All of that is
irrelevant. What Nobel wanted was a prize that promoted global disarmament.”
Nonetheless, for the many
Pakistanis and Indians who enthusiastically hailed the joint win by Ms.
Yousafzai and Mr. Satyarthi, it was a welcome taste of what unites, rather than
divides their countries: a shared interest in education and in improving the
plight of millions of downtrodden and abused children. And for Ms. Yousafzai,
it brings her story full circle, back to South Asia.
Once-cynical voices in Pakistan
were drowned out on Friday by a chorus of well-wishers. “A bright moment in
dark times,” said Nadeem Farooq Paracha, a news media commentator, on Twitter.
But a few clung to the old
conspiracy theories. “Her shooting was a ready-made drama that was created by
foreign powers,” said Ghulam Farooq, a newspaper editor in Ms. Yousafzai’s
hometown, Mingora.
Others noted ironies — that
Pakistan’s previous Nobel Prize winner, a scientist from the minority Ahmadi
community, had been shunned for his religious beliefs, and that for all of her
travel, the one country that Ms. Yousafzai cannot visit, for security reasons,
is her own.
“Maybe Malala can come home
now?” said Sharmeen Obaid Chinoy, a Pakistani filmmaker who won an Academy
Award in 2012.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий