By David E. Sanger
In a letter last month to
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, President Obama urged Iran’s supreme leader to seize
the opportunity of the Nov. 24 deadline for negotiating a nuclear agreement
with the West, arguing that Iran’s interests in the Middle East would be served
by proving its interest in nuclear technology was solely for the production of
electricity, according to senior administration officials.
The letter, first reported by
The Wall Street Journal on Thursday, also noted that the United States and Iran
had common interests in fighting the forces of the Islamic State, also known as
ISIL, in Iraq, and reassured Iran’s leaders that, in the words of one
administration official, “we’re only there to fight ISIL and you should let us
do it, because it will help you.”
Officials would not say if Mr.
Obama had received a response, but past letters to Ayatollah Khamenei have
usually resulted in lengthy diatribes about American intentions in the region.
The main sections of the letter
were intended to urge the supreme leader to make a fundamental choice on a
nuclear deal before his negotiators enter their last set of talks, first in
Oman this weekend, led by Secretary of State John Kerry, and then in Vienna.
Many senior American officials fear that the result could be inconclusive,
producing a vague statement of principles and another extension.
That process could drag on,
they fear, lead the Iranians to resume some fuel production they have halted,
encourage the Saudis to begin enrichment of their own and perhaps revive
Israeli threats to take military action.
But a collapse would also be
likely to mean Iranians would see no further sanctions relief — and perhaps new
sanctions from the new Republican Congress. “My fear is that the Iranians will
see the new Senate as a sign that the president is weak, and that he wouldn’t
be able to get sanctions lifted,” said one European negotiator dealing with the
Iranians, who would not speak on the record because of the delicacy of the
talks.
Mr. Obama’s letter was worded
generally; it did not get into specific negotiating points. But it appeared
intended to drive home to the hard-liners in the Iranian leadership that the
elements now under negotiation offered Iran a way to sign a deal and still be
left with a small nuclear enrichment capability. Those elements include an
informal agreement with Russia to convert Iran’s low-enriched uranium into
reactor fuel for the Bushehr nuclear power plant, Iran’s only commercial
nuclear reactor
But Ayatollah Khamenei has not
backed away from his demand that in seven years or so Iran would begin a
tenfold increase in its nuclear enrichment capability. That would reduce its
“breakout time,” the time required to make one bomb’s worth of highly enriched
uranium, to weeks.
Iran has lived up to all of the
provisions of a temporary agreement with the West it signed a year ago. But a
report issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency on Friday confirmed
that it has thwarted inspectors seeking information about suspected experiments
and designs that would point to a military use of its nuclear program.
The report indicated that Iran
is producing low-enriched uranium steadily but slowly. Its current stocks of
reactor-grade fuel, if converted into highly enriched, weapons-grade uranium, would
be enough to produce more than a half-dozen weapons. It is unclear how much of
that fuel will be shipped to Russia if the current negotiations are successful.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий